pd_recapturing
06-17 09:35 PM
If I am able to get the PD ported from EB3 to EB2, it will be May 2004 other wise, it will remain May 2004 for EB3. but, at the same time, I am not very sure that PD will be ported successfully, though, in my company, whoever has applied PD porting has got it ported. Is it worth taking the risk ?
wallpaper young Overweight women
Counterproductive
10-28 09:09 PM
No need to say sorry to me, I was just pointing it out.
Don't really know how popular it was, it might not be an issue.
But just to be safe you might want to change it.
Don't really know how popular it was, it might not be an issue.
But just to be safe you might want to change it.
Blog Feeds
02-23 12:40 PM
Ah, the magical E-Verify solution. If we just required it for everything from getting a job to applying for any kind of government benefit and now qualifying for a mortgage, all would be right with America. In the mean time, innocent Americans are still getting caught in non-confirmation hell. For example, I'm trying to help a good friend who is a fourth generation American who inexplicably has been bounced in E-Verify. She has taken multiple trips to the Social Security Administration office and spent hours on the phone over the last several weeks trying to fix this glitch and yesterday...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/bill-introduced-to-extend-everify-to-mortgage-applicants.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/02/bill-introduced-to-extend-everify-to-mortgage-applicants.html)
2011 hairstyles for fat people.
dollar500
12-11 05:17 PM
I was wondering if it's possible to add a meter like one used at Wikipedia for fundraising..
http://upload.wikimedia.org/fundraising/2007/people-meter-ltr.png That will be a big motivation to many of the members.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/fundraising/2007/people-meter-ltr.png That will be a big motivation to many of the members.
more...
shruthi07
06-04 10:47 AM
.
kirupa
12-01 07:38 PM
You can actually do it more elegantly by fiddling with the HTML DOM: http://michaelsync.net/2008/07/25/silverlight-and-flash-interoperability-using-html-bridge-and-externalinterface-api-by-jonas-folles%C3%B8
:)
:)
more...
uma001
11-16 04:46 PM
Even if your status changed to H1 in October 2004 and you started working in November 2004 for a second employer following approval for that employer, I would say it is just 30days and would not be an issue in future GC application. Don't worry about it.
What do you mean by that. Is she going to file green card in future?She did not say that. May be she wants to go back to her native country once H1 expires.Am I right? H1 visa are given to stay here temporarily for 6 years not to get green cards.First husbands get green cardsm then spouses get green cards, then their parents and in-laws get green cards. This is why lot of primary H1 people are stuck in the line for past 8-9 years without promotions,salary hikes,buying homes. When there are no job for primary H1s, don't understand why spouses want to work.That's why lot of folks are going back to their native places.Competition wihtin out guys.Its like siblings fighting for same job in a single family.
What do you mean by that. Is she going to file green card in future?She did not say that. May be she wants to go back to her native country once H1 expires.Am I right? H1 visa are given to stay here temporarily for 6 years not to get green cards.First husbands get green cardsm then spouses get green cards, then their parents and in-laws get green cards. This is why lot of primary H1 people are stuck in the line for past 8-9 years without promotions,salary hikes,buying homes. When there are no job for primary H1s, don't understand why spouses want to work.That's why lot of folks are going back to their native places.Competition wihtin out guys.Its like siblings fighting for same job in a single family.
2010 hairstyles for overweight
vishwak
01-01 03:17 PM
There won't be any issues.
BTW, whats your port of entry.
While leaving take all appropriate documents like Paystubs, Employment Verification Letter etc and also you vacation approvel details if needed.
BTW, whats your port of entry.
While leaving take all appropriate documents like Paystubs, Employment Verification Letter etc and also you vacation approvel details if needed.
more...
zobie
09-18 01:14 PM
Great Jobs guys.. Sorry couldn't make it due to work related commitments. keep up the good work.. Been searching for any news on web or TV.. nothing yet..Best of luck
hair hairstyles for obese women.
mkrisa
08-07 09:34 PM
Guys, I have some questions?
Can we file I-765 (EAD) and not use it? Do we have to renew it even though we dont use it?
Please let me know.
Thanks
Can we file I-765 (EAD) and not use it? Do we have to renew it even though we dont use it?
Please let me know.
Thanks
more...
nmdial
08-21 12:54 PM
My wife is currently on H4 and she is planning to apply for Residency here in the US on an exchange visa (J1). Let us suppose that she gets her status adjusted here in the US from H4 to J1 and then travels outside the US (say India). Then, she would have to get a J1 visa stamped on her passport. Considering that her spouse (that's me) would be on H1B, it would be rather difficult for her to prove that she would return to India. Do you think there is a greater chance of denial of J1 visa to her at the US consulate? If yes, how do you recommend we go about doing it? Your answer would be appreciated.
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
------------------------------
LC and I-140 Approved; EB2 PD 22 Feb 2008
hot overweight womenquot; photo
bluekayal
05-18 04:14 PM
Ellen Krengel at Palo Alto?
ekrengel@yahoo.com
I am looking for someone in San Jose, Fremont, Milpitas, ..nearby areas. Sorry for not being specific last time.
ekrengel@yahoo.com
I am looking for someone in San Jose, Fremont, Milpitas, ..nearby areas. Sorry for not being specific last time.
more...
house hairstyle once in a while,
bigboy007
08-24 10:45 PM
This is a contract position to work in canada.This is normally through couple of vendors.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
My employer is a small consulting company,which don't have own projects.So they pay only when I get project with other consultancies companies and bill through them.
You get work visa in canada then you need to be paid in canada..Work visa in canada has nothing to do with that of US status.
If you are getting paid in usa ( it seems like) and planning on working in canada on visitor visa its not legal. This might be the reason.
Your status in US has nothing to do with Working/Visiting/studying in Canada.
If you have used AP you "Probably" not on H1 any more.. there are some contradicting statements of IV members on this before. But I have seen USCIS sending a notice for one of my friend where in which he was advised to use AP ( as he is considered being on AOS eventhough he has H1) in future.
tattoo short hairstyles for fat women
GCHope2011
09-12 11:04 PM
Hi all!
Thanks a lot for the information...
The mother's status will be illegal, unless the mother marries a legal resident and changes over to a dependent status..
Thanks a lot for the information...
The mother's status will be illegal, unless the mother marries a legal resident and changes over to a dependent status..
more...
pictures hair styles for over weight
aksaharan
09-24 03:46 PM
No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State
The Department of State issued a letter to Section 245 Adjudications indicating that as of September 16, 2010, visas for FY2010 were no longer available for all family cases and for certain employment based cases (EB-2, EB-3, other workers, EB-4, and certain religious workers). FY2011 numbers will be available on October 1, 2010.
Source: US Immigration Law Blog - by Ashwin Sharma, Esq.: No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/09/24/no-more-visa-numbers-until-october-1-2010--department-of-state.aspx)
The Department of State issued a letter to Section 245 Adjudications indicating that as of September 16, 2010, visas for FY2010 were no longer available for all family cases and for certain employment based cases (EB-2, EB-3, other workers, EB-4, and certain religious workers). FY2011 numbers will be available on October 1, 2010.
Source: US Immigration Law Blog - by Ashwin Sharma, Esq.: No More Visa Numbers Until October 1, 2010 - Department of State (http://ashwinsharma.com/2010/09/24/no-more-visa-numbers-until-october-1-2010--department-of-state.aspx)
dresses facebook, Best
chanduv23
11-14 10:19 AM
Your 485 has to be reapplied and priority dates come into picture. You can change jobs but have to use H1b based on approved 140. You have to start the GC process all over again but you can retain the priority date because your 140 is already approved.
Talk to a lawyer - to get a better understanding
Talk to a lawyer - to get a better understanding
more...
makeup hairstyles for fat women.
bkshres
10-07 03:59 PM
Any suggestion whether to switch attorney after using AC21 and moving to new company?
girlfriend hot haircuts for fat people.
eb3India
06-22 10:35 AM
Congradulations again to all those IV memeber who are getting Green card approvals and goodluck to all those members who are able to file their I485 and get EAD, just to be out of H1B /H4 clutches and one more step closer to green card
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
As current drastic visa movment proved the fact that for IV members main issue is not current law but itz implimentation. a change in law will certainly help, but thatz not our big problem
I would like to discuss your IV future agend with current situation, Please post your opinion how you think IV should procede based on current situations.
I belive IV should now concentrate more on making sure current law is implimented in a more effeciant way, make sure USCIS does not waste any visa numbers, we need to push for speeding citizenship processes and makeup for loss time during retrogression
IV should stop chasing CIR which has nothing for us and itz very controversial
IV is for legals and we should concentrate only on whatz good for us
I really appreciate core members opinion
by the way I got my approval for my I485
hairstyles Hairstyles For Overweight
seemashah
02-21 04:26 PM
Hi:
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
I was working for Company A from 2000 to 2004. Company A applied for my GC in 2002. However, the company was not doing well until I left it. It was not paying me the salary which came out in PW. Company A continued with my GC processing and I filed for I140 and 485 last year in June. Now received the following RFE for I140:
Please submit documentary evidence that you, the petitioning employer, have the financial
ability to pay the wage/salary you offered the beneficiary. This evidence must show that you
have this financial capability on the date you fied the ETA with the Department of Labor and
cover up until the visa is issued. The petitioner may submit evidence that their net income is
equal to or greater than the proffered wage, evidence that the petitioner's net current assets
are equal to or greater than the proffered wage, or evidence that the petitioner not only is
employing the beneficiary but also has paid or is currently paying the proffered wage. The
service wil also consider copies of audited annual reports of the employer, or copies of
audited financial statements of the employer. Evidence is needed for 2002-2003.
Does anyone have some idea how to get the audited financial statements or audited annual reports?. I know that the company never had any audited reports. I had submitted the bank statements of the company and the tax returns with my I140. However, it seems that they want the audited reports. The company was not doing well in 2002/2003. However, it is doing well now. So any input will be highly appreciated.
signin241
07-25 09:24 AM
Thanks for the responses. I have all the documents in place and also the recent paystubs of my present employer.
waiting for GC2010
11-18 09:32 AM
Yes one must be a Greencard holder to attain unemployment benifits.
Not permitted with EAD.
Not permitted with EAD.
Walang komento:
Mag-post ng isang Komento